From: <sh...@al...> - 2000-03-03 12:26:59
|
> There's something here that doesn't make a lot of sense. Why on earth > does anyone need to *set* the printer resolution, anyway? Isn't it > fundamentally a property of the printer hardware? Nope. You figured it out. That's the trade secret. It's Epson's new adjustable with print head. I just issued the ESC ( D 0xff 0xff 0x01 0x01 command and printed out a new microprocessor microlithography mask at 65535 DPI. Epson doesn't want you to know that their printers can support this resolution, since they were planning on gradually re-releasing the same printer over and over again, over the next 10 years, with just a simple software change to support higher and higher resolutions. In fact, it was so secret, they didn't even tell their developer relations staff. Now they're ruined. Seriously, though, this makes some sense. In designing the new printer protocols, they simply moved the printer resolution from each individual raster transfer to once in the header. It's a sensible thing to do. Eric |