From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-27 18:21:08
|
From: sh...@al... Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 02:07:49 +0900 > Somebody in the core Gimp team made massive changes to the dialog box > (in 3.0!). Mmm. I don't like it when someone drives over my part of the noosphere either. Turns out that it was a case of miscommunication here. The person who actually made the changes thought I had finished with 3.0, and so he'd be free to make changes. I still don't think he should have done that without discussing it with me. > It's generally an improvement, although I have some > quibbles over it. That's the worst kind. Too good to ignore, but, not as good as if you'd done it yourself. At least, from your point of view. Well, the short term issue is that the Gimp's sliders aren't as good as GTK's. > I think that the 1.0 compatibility is important, since 1.2 is not out > yet, and users of 1.0 really need a better printing solution than what > they presently have. We won't know if it's compatible or not until someone actually tries it, which is more likely to happen if it's checked in. OK, I'll put it in. We'll back it out if there's a problem. > In any event, this kind of fixed dialog is hardly what I envision, and > when Steve last commented it sounded like he had some good ideas about > cleaning up the dialog and in general improving the situation. Can he implement them on top of the new version? Same issue. Steve's working on the GUI and shouldn't have the rug yanked out from under him. The problem is that they're more than just cosmetic changes; |