From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-17 12:24:31
|
From: sh...@al... Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 18:06:00 +0900 > (or half as wide, I don't know). I think it's half as wide. If you enable the secret unprint error detection codes, you'll get a warning message if the unprinter ever puts ink of the same color on the same spot on the page more than once. The reason this is not enabled by default is that it occurs so often (in this file) that you have to wait 30 minutes for all the warning messages to scroll across your terminal. Pixels are being put on top of one another. That would happen if it's half as wide as it should be, but not if it's twice as tall. I'm quite certain you're correct. There's no particular reason for the height to be wrong. > I took a closer look at the output files my friend sent me. It looks > like the one printed at 720 dpi advances on average 24 rows per pass, > while the one printed at 1440 dpi advances on average 12 rows per > pass. So I think that my theory about double spacing (effectively 360 > dpi rather than 720 with ESCi) is probably correct. So, do you think that ESCi is permanently fixed at 360 DPI, or is the mystery ESC ( D command putting the machine into "double space" mode? Yeah, I really wonder about that. I wonder what other arguments to that command would do. Right now I'm completely puzzled by it. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |