Re: [Gimp-print-devel] release? and how to contact printer companies

[<sh...@al...>]

> I noticed :-) I think the problem is in the image size or the
> image location:
> 
> Image from (2147483647,8020) to (0,8019).
> 
> The start position is definitely wrong.

This is normal for the case of no data.  The left edge defaults to MAX_INT
and the right edge defaults to 0.  The raster data is then scanned to look
for pixels to the left of the left edge or to the right of the right edge,
and then the edges are reassigned.

This is done to avoid printing an 8.5" x 11" or A4 or whatever size ppm
every time.  Only the printed region is converted to ppm.

If there is no raster data, then you get the above.  Now I just have to
figure out why it ignored all of the raster data.

Eric