From: Robert L K. <rl...@al...> - 2000-02-08 12:09:26
|
From: sh...@al... Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2000 20:19:50 +0900 Ok, another ESCP2 question. There are two ways to transfer raster data. "ESC i" and "ESC .". "ESC i" explicitly specifies the number of bits per pixel. "ESC ." does not. Is it kosher to use "ESC ." while printing in multibit mode? I had assumed that "ESC ." implied 1 bit per pixel, and that "ESC i" was required for multi-bit pixels, but, the current CVS version of the driver is using "ESC ." even in multi-bit format. Seems a little fishy to me. In microweave or softweave mode? In microweave mode it isn't using multibit at all. I thought I had fixed the softweave code (and I know I've tested it) to use ESCi in multibit mode. ESC. will not do multibit stuff; there's no way to express it. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/ Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |