[Gimp-print-devel] Re: Gimp-print-devel digest, Vol 1 #14 - 5 msgs

[Dave H. <da...@mi...>]

Robert L Krawitz <rl...@al...> wrote

>    Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 00:29:37 +0800
>    From: Nick Urbanik <ni...@vt...>
>    CC: gim...@li...
> 
>    Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> 
>    >   But I have
>    >    already run into a problem compiling 3.05.  I've only briefly scanned
>    >    the list archives, so perhaps this has already been answered, but I get
>    >    an error in print.c regarding libgimp/gimpintl.h missing. I did a find
>    >    from / and it isn't anywhere.  I have 1.04 installed.  Is this a new
>    >    file or is something else going on?
> 
>    I mentioned this problem with RH Linux 6.1 on Intel PIII.
> 
>    > If you put -DGIMP_1_0 on the build command line you supposedly can
>    > build it under 1.0, but 1.1 is better for this.
> 
>    Putting -DGIMP_1_0 did not solve the problem of libgimp/gimpintl.h
>    missing.  P.S.  As I mentioned in my previous email, I used an
>    edited version of Makefile.standalone (patch was in previous
>    email).
> 
> Trust me, it will, one of these days :-)
> 
>    Hoping one day to be able to get printing working properly.
> 
> I haven't played with the 1.0 support myself; it's entirely possible
> it's broken, unfortunately...
> 

The 1.0 support is still working in the CVS I downloaded today! Check
in print.c at line 64 for the line:-

#ifdef GIMP_1_0

The code that follows this ifdef only includes libgimp/gimpintl.h if
GIMP_1_0 is NOT defined on the command line when compiling.

The line in my Makefile.standalone reads:-

OPTLEVEL = -O6 -funroll-all-loops -Wall -DGIMP_1_0

and it compiles fine with GIMP 1.0.4.

Dave Hill

-- 
Dave Hill, Kempston, Bedford UK		da...@mi...
Sicth munce ago, I cutn't evun spel enjuneer, and now I are one!