|
From: Robert K. <rl...@al...> - 2021-11-01 22:47:08
|
On 11/1/21 1:29 AM, Oliver Kowalke wrote: > > It should be possible to support this, other than the violet channel. We could support the violet > channel for raw printing (i. e. the user has to do the separations), but actually supporting the > violet ink for normal printing would be a fair bit of tuning work and would need to be hands-on. If > you're interested in doing this, be prepared to put a lot of time and a fair bit of consumables > into it. > > The first thing to do would be to look at src/xml/escp2/inks/cmykrb.xml in the Gutenprint source > tree to see an example of what we did for the R1800 and R800, which is CMYK+red+blue (which is > actually closer to purple, but Epson calls it blue). The most non-standard part of this is the > <Curves> section, which is a set of transfer curves for each ink channel by hue, starting with > blue=0. I always tested these by printing a rainbow sweep pattern and trying to get as good of a > match as I could with ordinary CMY(K). > > My thought about this is that we should at least at first only support the violet ink in raw mode, > as effectively a spot color. > > Your description applies to the violett channel?! > Because I'm new to print driver development I'd like to start with supporting the matte black > channel. At least I think it should be easier, right? > What would be your advice to start? The channel ID for matte black will probably be the same as it is on every other printer that uses matte black. |