Re: [Gimp-print-devel] Mac Big sur

[Matt B. <wal...@ma...>]

> On Feb 21, 2021, at 2:22 PM, Mark Terry <ma...@gm...> wrote:
> 
> 
> Thanks for your quick reply. 
> Its a Canon Pro 9000 mk.II (USB)
> Yes - am using the same printer as specified when I added it.
> Highlighted printer indicates Gutenberg, but 5.3.3. not 5.3.4...
> Yes, Rosetta 2 installed as default.
> 
> 
> I can specify the Gutenberg driver:
> <Screenshot 2021-02-21 at 20.00.09.png>
> 
> 
> 
> But limited options:
> 
> <Screenshot 2021-02-21 at 20.13.11.png>
> 
> 
> Could the 5.33 instead of 5.3.4 be the cause? Otherwise I can wait until native M1...
> 
> Thanks for your help
> 
> Mark
 
Please respond to the list and not to me individually.

All of the printer settings will be available when you select Printer Settings.
Matt

Sent from my iPad

> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 19:57, Matt Broughton <wal...@ma...> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> > On Feb 21, 2021, at 8:40 AM, mark terry via Gimp-print-devel <gim...@li...> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Hi, 
>> > 
>> > I have downloaded the latest Gutenbeg Driver for OSX, which works with Big Sur (although I understand it is not specifically designed for M1 Macs yet.)
>> > 
>> > The printer settings do not give me access to any colour adjustment - only basic settings - I'm sure I'm making a simple mistake but help would be appreciated.
>> 
>> What printer do you have?  There are several things I can think of for your problem.  
>> 
>> The limitation to make only the basic choices is usually associated with AirPrint drivers.  When you added the printer from the System Preferences, were you able to actually specify the Gutenprint drivers?  Are you using the printer with the same name as you added from the System Preferences.  When you highlight your printer in Printers & Scanners, The "Kind:" should indicated that you are using CUPS+Gutenprint v 5.3.4
>> 
>> Do you have Rosetta 2 installed?  Currently Rosetta 2 is required to use the Gutenprint drivers.  When we do have a package that supports the M1 chip natively, there shouldn't be any difference in how it appears.  It will use the same code base as is now used for the Intel based Macs.  Presumably the M1 and Intel drivers will be compiled at the same time.  Each binary will have both the Intel and the M1 component.
>> 
>> Matt
>> 
>>