Re: [Gimp-print-devel] MacOS 10.6

[Robert K. <rl...@al...>]

On 2/3/21 9:35 AM, Matt Broughton wrote:
>> On Feb 2, 2021, at 6:29 PM, Solomon Peachy <pi...@sh...> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 06:15:51PM -0500, Robert Krawitz wrote:
>>> Other than a couple of Mac mini systems that lived on through August 
>>> 2007, these were all short-lived laptops that were discontinued at 
>>> various times in 2006, so close to 15 years ago.
>>
>> 10.6 was also the final release to support running PPC binaries (via 
>> Rosetta) so there might be folks with newer hardware that are legitimately
>> stuck on it. 
> 
> The ones "stuck" on 10.6 may be the enterprise people.  How long did it take for businesses to update from Windows 98.  I'm not so sure about the home user.  You can't do much if anything on the internet.>
>> I like the sound of Matt's proposal of two installer packages, one for 
>> 10.6->10.12, and another for 10.13+, but that obviously carries ongoing 
>> support burdens for us, especially for platforms that Apple ceased 
>> supporting over a decade ago.
> 
> I suggested that because I think it takes a lot more time and resources to build a one off for 10.6.  Also, if I remember correctly, when Michael Sweet offered to help us, he indicated that he may not be able to support anything lower than 10.13.  With more systems that could use an unsigned installer, it  *might* be justified to offer a package that wasn't signed.

You and Steve have a much better understanding of the Apple market than I do, certainly.  When
you've determined what you're going to do, I'll cut a new release build.