Re: [Gimp-print-devel] MacOS 10.6

[Matt B. <wal...@ma...>]

> On Feb 2, 2021, at 1:23 PM, Steve Letter via Gimp-print-devel <gim...@li...> wrote:
> 
> The only easily implemented option to continue support for Snow Leopard is to build a second version without signing.  I haven't tested this but I think it would work.  Is this something we really want though?
> 
> Steve Letter You're never to old to learn something stupid.  -- unknown

Just thinking out loud here.  Would it make more sense to build an unsigned package for Snow Leopard 10.6 through Sierra 10.12?  I'm thinking that may may provide a longer term solution.  We would then have a fat binary with x86_64 and arm64 with a signed package for later versions of macos.

Matt