|
From: Robert K. <rl...@al...> - 2020-11-27 16:40:02
|
On 11/27/20 10:20 AM, Matt Broughton wrote: > > >> On Nov 26, 2020, at 8:42 AM, Steve Letter <sle...@ya... <mailto:sle...@ya...>> wrote: >> >> So i don’t need to build any more? I no longer work for a printer manufacturer and don’t have my >> current employer’s support (haven’t for quite some time). I don’t even do any Mac work so I have >> kept my developer ID simply for this work. >> >> I WOULD like to continue, if I can be of help. My current position, senior Embedded Engineer has >> me working in the security industry, both bare metal and embedded Linux. So this would be my only >> way to keep my hand in Mac development. >> >> Steve Letter >> Sent from my Commodore PET > > I can't speak for Michael, but my guess is that he wasn't volunteering to be the maintainer for the > long haul. The Mac sector at Gutenprint had not yet been able to post a signed and notarized > version that would install on macos 10.15.x. Michael was able to get your last package notarized and > is making it available for us to use. > > The last correspondence with you indicated that you had not yet been able to get the package > notarized. Have you been able to overcome the hurdles of getting things notarized? I think that > Xcode 12 will be needed to deal with Apple's new chipset. That requires macos 15.x or macos 11. > Would you be able to those build environments available? I *think* those are the minimum > requirements that are now needed for a Mac maintainer. > > It is really up to Robert to determine what he needs for a maintainer. The only thing I can do is > to help specify the technical requirements as best I know them. My concern is simply how we get to having clean Mac builds. Not being a Mac expert myself, I have to trust those who are. If Mike and Steve want to do it such that Steve does the builds and Mike notarizes them, that's fine; if they agree to some other arrangement, that's fine also. I just want to get quality builds done in a reasonable amount of time. |