From: Robert K. <rl...@al...> - 2019-09-14 00:11:13
|
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 10:00:50 -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:35:15PM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: >> If the hanful of test prints I've made so fare are any indication, it's >> definitely for the better (color test charts are visibly improved) but >> it's still a non-trivial change in output. > > I've now tested five printers from three manufacturers; the output is > visibly improved with all of them, with better contrast and tonal range > across the board. This sounds very much like the problem we had with color laser printers early on, and as I recall. I'm not a huge fan of changing color output of stable printers during a release train, but this is more of a bug, and I think fixing it is the right thing to do. > As an added bonus, when using the manufacturer ICC profiles the outputs > are finally consistent with each other! > > So I've commited the change. > > But since this change represents a significant change in output, I added > an option to revert to the old behavior, defaulting to off. If the > user enables "LegacyDyesubGamma", the dyesub driver will revert to the > old behavior. > > ...I still need to document this change in the NEWS file though. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> *** MIT Engineers A Proud Tradition http://mitathletics.com *** Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- http://ProgFree.org Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |