From: Robert K. <rl...@al...> - 2019-06-23 00:41:37
|
On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 17:27:28 -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 04:09:13PM -0400, Robert Krawitz wrote: >> I'm considering making --with-cups be the default (as opposed to >> automatic), and if CUPS development bits aren't present, erroring >> out. One would need to specify --without-cups explicitly to do a >> build without CUPS. > > I think this is a good idea! I just pushed this, with an error message that I think is impossible to avoid (and it halts the configure run immediately) and I believe to be unambiguous. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> *** MIT Engineers A Proud Tradition http://mitathletics.com *** Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- http://ProgFree.org Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |