From: Solomon P. <pi...@sh...> - 2018-02-15 23:02:57
|
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 01:09:50PM -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > Can you provide some specifics to what you mean by "commercial grade"? > Gutenprint is already widely used for commercial purposes (such as photo > kiosks) and it is not clear how Gutenprint may be lacking in this > regard. Are you perhaps interested in using Gutenprint as the basis of > an application SDK, or looking to replace your current OSX drivers? Gary and I have done a few rounds of off-list discussion, but he's going to be out of the office for a few days so it seemed like time to bring it back into the open to see what everyone else thinks. Essentially, Citizen is considering using Gutenprint as the basis of their future OSX drivers. Thanks to customer demand, they are also interested in providing official Linux support too. From our discussions, it appears as if the core printer support is already essentially complete and fairly well tested, so I expect there will only be a little bit of work to be done on the hardware enablement front (essentially fixing any bugs uncovered by a proper QA cycle with real hardware, and possibly tuning the output or creating an ICC profile to match what their existing drivers generate) So while that is all good and beneficial for all involved, I believe they're really looking for a one-stop vendor relationship that can, for appropriate consideration, produce an installable driver package for them, and provide ongoing maintainence and feature releases as bugfixes, hardware, and new OS releases warrant. They would handle end-user support. That's a reasonable wish, but what's unclear is the level of polish they're after -- eg are they okay with a generic Gutenprint driver package not unlike we already supply today, or would they want some sort of unique-to-citizen release? Would they want unique-to-OSX features, like a spiffier control panel or status monitor? And (rather importantly) are the terms of the GPL acceptible? On the Linux front, exising Linux distro channels are probably okay if they are recent enough, but for older/enterprise/LTS-type distros it would be highly advantagous if we could provide more up-to-date OS packages. That would tie nicely into the CI system we've been talking about for a while. Personally, I don't think Gutenprint as a project is in a position to provide much more than we already do, mostly due to our very limited resources and expertise with respect to OSX. Of our current-ish contributors, only Steve has the ability to even generate OSX builds, and we're entirely reliant upon him to test those builds. I'm also not terribly fond of Apple, but if improving things for OSX gains us additional resources to make Gutenprint better for Linux and other Free Software platforms.. it's worth considering. Thoughts? - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org Coconut Creek, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. |