From: Robert K. <rl...@al...> - 2014-05-24 02:01:54
|
On Fri, 23 May 2014 08:09:46 -0700, John Labovitz wrote: > Sure enough, I did get this wrong. But it’s an easy fix. > > Robert — would you like me to rebuild and upload a replacement > 5.2.10, or should I add a sub-version number making it something > like 5.2.10a? I think 5.2.10a would be better -- then send out an announcement that everyone should download the new one and we get rid of the old. > On 22 May 2014, at 6:30 AM, Jonatã Bolzan <jo...@jo...> wrote: > >> Hi there >> >> The Bundle version of the last package is incorrect, it is the same as version 5.2.9 (net.sourceforge.Gutenprint-5.2.9 should be something like net.sourceforge.Gutenprint-5.9.10). >> >> Thanks for the attention. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> MIT VI-3 1987 - Congrats MIT Engineers 6 straight men's hoops tourney Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- http://ProgFree.org Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |