Re: [ggt-devel] New GMTL release

[Patrick H. <pa...@in...>]

Allen Bierbaum wrote:
> I think a release would be a "good thing".
> 
> There is one pending addition I would like to see added.
> 
> - Make use of the static assert capabilities in all methods where it
> is known at compile time that the method call is invalid.

I could add this, but someone would have to tell me what functions and 
methods need it.

> I don't have time to add this myself, so I am not going to object to
> vehemently if this doesn't get added before the release.

There can always be a 0.4.5 release made after the static assertions are 
added.

  -Patrick

> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:30:10 -0600, Aron Bierbaum <ar...@ia...> wrote:
> 
>>Patrick Hartling wrote:
>>
>>>Would anyone object to me making a new release of GMTL?  The current
>>>version is 0.4.4.  There hasn't been a GMTL release in quite a while,
>>>and all my testing has shown that the lastest code base is usable with a
>>>variety of compilers.
>>>
>>> -Patrick
>>
>>Nope, considering all of the recent changes I think that it is a good idea.
>>
>>-Aron


-- 
Patrick L. Hartling                    | VP Engineering, Infiscape Corp.
PGP: http://tinyurl.com/2msw3          | http://www.infiscape.com/