Re: [Gfs-users] gfs_domain_homogeneous_bc action?
Brought to you by:
popinet
From: Geordie M. <gdm...@fr...> - 2008-04-22 03:45:26
|
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Stephane Popinet <s.p...@ni...> wrote: > > > > I got my answer. But main remained issue for me is related to third > > kind BC as you said (of course depend on field solution too). > > Unfortunately Gerris does not support such BCs while they are > > important in real world applications. They are not difficult to > > include in Gerris. I do some early effort but, indeed, needs your > > assistance to complete this job in a consistence manner. Anytime you > > decide for this I will be happy to assist. I think that It will take > > at maximum couple of hours. I will be very grateful if you attend to > > this problem. > > It's on my list of things to do. You could help by reformatting the test > case you sent (on the wiki page) following the guidelines in the > previous message. We could then include this test case in the default > test suite of Gerris and then implement the required changes to make it > work. Hi Ruhollah. I stumbled across http://gfs.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/GfsBcNavier which I see is for specifying `third kind' (a.k.a. Robin or radiation) boundary conditions for velocity components. Can GfsBcNavier be applied to diffusing scalars? If not, could the code behind it be used to implement a GfsBcRobin command? |