Re: [Gestalt-users] Memo functions

[Florent G. <dar...@ya...>]

Colin Paul Adams wrote:

  Hi

> I have changed the non-compliant gexslt:memo-function extension
> attribute to do nothing but issue a warning message.

> Instead I have introduced the extension instruction gexslt:function.

  If I remember correctly the discussion we had on XSL List, the
attribute is not conmpliant because an extension attribute cannot
change the behaviour of an XSLT instruction in anyway.  Do someone
remember the discussion, I can't find it in the archive?

> This is identical to xsl:function except that it memoizes the
> result just like specifying gexslt:memo-function="yes" used to
> do.

  Instead of defining gexslt:function to have the exact meaning of
xsl:function with memoizing in addition, why not defining it to have
the exact form/meaning of xsl:function, but with additional attributes
(at the moment just @memo-function or @memoize).

  That would make it possible to add another extension attribute to
gexslt:function, without interfering with its memoization behaviour:

    <!-- Maybe additional non-standard attributes... -->
    <gexslt:function name="..." memoize="true">
      ...
    </gexslt:function>

  Regards,

--drkm






















      
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! 
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses 
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com