Re: [Gestalt-users] [ gestalt-Bugs-1563054 ]gexslt:transformation() and namespace bindings

[Florent G. <dar...@ya...>]

Colin Adams wrote:

  Hi

> It is absolutely correct for
> function-available(gexslt:transformation) to return false
> for use-when processing.

  Yes.

> This is required behaviour.

  Do you mean function-available('gexslt:transformation') is
required to evaluate to false when used in @use-when?  On the
contrary, I think the intention behind §3.12 is to have such
functions included in the static context:

    - standard functions have to be in the static context;

    - stylesheet functions (that is, XPath functions defined
      by the user with the help of the xsl:function
      instruction) must not be in the static context;

    - extension functions (as gexslt:transformation() or
      saxon:serialize()) may be in the static context.  This
      is implementation-defined.

  I think that earlier an extension function can be
registered in the static context, better it is for
everybody.

  This is my understanding, maybe it is wrong?  I'm not sure
that you think function-available('gexslt:transformation')
is required to evaluate to false, but if you do so, I don't
see how you deduce that from the CR.

  Regards,

--drkm



















	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! 
Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. 
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com