Re: [Gestalt-users] New extension function

[Colin A. <col...@ho...>]

>From: Florent Georges <dar...@ya...>

>   I wonder if it would be interesting to permit an element() or a
>document-node() instead of the URI to identify the XSLT script.  This
>would allow to really construct the script dynamically, then pass it to
>the transform function.

That's not possible for a number of reasons.
If you want to do this, then you can write a transformation to generate your
required stylesheet and serialize it to a destination named by a URI. A 
named pipe
perhaps.

>   Also, maybe a gexslt:transform-error() function could be interesting
>to return the error given the result of the transformation.  It is more
>clear than testing that the N-th item is a QName, isn't it?  If the
>transformation is successfull, this function returns the empty
>sequence.

And if it isn't successful? It can only return the same sequence as now.
So you can write this as an xsl:function if you wish.

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free! 
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb