Re: [Gestalt-users] New extension function
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
colin-adams
From: Colin P. A. <co...@co...> - 2006-07-14 23:49:52
|
>>>>> "Frans" == Frans Englich <fra...@te...> writes: Frans> On Friday 14 July 2006 20:13, Florent Georges wrote: >> Frans Englich wrote: > However, I would prefer a whitespace >> separated list of > xs:anyURIs where it is implementation >> defined which that > are recognized(and where unrecognized are >> ignored). In > this way any implementation can add performance >> settings > in a portable way. >> >> Personally, I see well a list of QNames or strings in the same >> lexical space (resolved with the in-scope namespaces). URIs >> can be a pain to manipulate, IMHO, while QNames provide the >> same level of isolation (because namespaces are URIs), with the >> advantage of the readibility. Frans> Good idea. Well, 2/2 and I see no objection, so I'll do that. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire |