Re: [Gestalt-users] New extension function

[Frans E. <fra...@te...>]

On Friday 14 July 2006 20:13, Florent Georges wrote:
> Frans Englich wrote:
> > However, I would prefer a whitespace separated list of
> > xs:anyURIs where it is implementation defined which that
> > are recognized(and where unrecognized are ignored). In
> > this way any implementation can add performance settings
> > in a portable way.
>
>   Personally, I see well a list of QNames or strings in the
> same lexical space (resolved with the in-scope namespaces).
> URIs can be a pain to manipulate, IMHO, while QNames provide
> the same level of isolation (because namespaces are URIs),
> with the advantage of the readibility.

Good idea.


		Frans