From: Alessio F. <ale...@gm...> - 2005-02-21 13:53:10
|
HI all, In my organization we are trying to develop an initial release of a WCS based on the geoserver WFS which we will probably release as open source. We would like to take profit of the power of geotools by using the coverage package. I have been look around a while and now I have a couple of annotations/questions I would like to hear feedback for. 1>Do you recommend us to use geotools 2.1 or geotools 2.0? What about develpoing missing features in 2.1? 2>We are thinking about a general format to store coverages. Any ideas? IS there something already done to work on? 3>Are gridcoverages mainly made to represent 2d coverages ? In such a case, any ideas about how to represent 3d and 4d coverages (I guess we would need a different back end then a buffered image...) 4> Anyone interested in joining us to deveolp things are missing in geotools/geoserver? Feel free to ask/suggest anything you think might be of help/interest. Regards, Simone Giannecchini Alessio Fabiani |