Re: [Geotools-gt2-users] Different results in coordinate transformation depending on used jar-Files (geotools v2.4 vs. geotools v2.5)

[Erich S. <eri...@gm...>]

> 
> Great, one works that's all we need. 
> 

Hmm, but it leaves a unpleasant feeling ;-)

> I would guess that there's some factory configuration issue that you
> could resolve to get hsql to work but it's not worth our time to pursue
> that now. 
> 
> However, be warned that if you move to Geotools 2.5+ one day, the
> situation may be reversed with hsql being the only one that
> works---you'll have to see.
> 

Some minutes ago, I switched to GT 2.5. The effect is that hqsql deliveres wrong
results (concerning Gauss-Kruger zone 2), while wkt results look plausible. For
this I will use GT 2.5.
Nearby: Is there any disadvantage using wkt instead of hqsql?

Thanks

Erich