From: Jody G. <jga...@re...> - 2008-05-09 16:52:42
|
Andrea Aime wrote: > Which test cases are you talking about? The build is working? > Oh, do you mean the postgis feaure collection ones depending on > a database you only have? Those I killed yesterday replacing them > with tests that do work over the standard testing data (a correctness > test does not need tables with thousands of data) and yes, they > are working now (after my yesterday's patches, that is). Thanks - that is great news. It is one of the things holding udig back (see the technical dept page). No the test cases I am having problems with are for all of the java implementations of the Classification functions; ie process the featurecollection and produce something like a histogram. Let me find a list of them; - EqualIntervalFunction - QuantileFunction - StandardDeviationFunction - UniqueIntervalFunction I see that a few specific test cases are "X"ed out and are not being run. I remember having problems trying to get some splits going based on Strings; the interaction between comparable was killing me. > SLD was not in the picture during OWS5? We participated in WCS 1.1.1 > cite, WFS 1.1 + xlink cite, KML experiments. We used a bit of SLD 1.0 > in the last one, both us and Cubewerx (SE 1.1 was taken out of the > question from day one since none of the testers supported it). Wonder who did the work then, I will be very said if the define functions we cannot represent in CQL. >> Andrea note that the "Concatenate" function takes any number of >> strings which is a new trick for our Funtion API. > I see, interesting... Does it mean we have to change the API (did not > look). That is something that Eclesia is slowly beating me over the head with - ask him :-) I think we can handle all the functions they define; except possibly their version of a classification function (think something like a function that takes a series or "threashold" / "value" pairs ). Jody |