From: Adrian C. <ac...@gm...> - 2007-07-17 20:43:32
|
Wait, wait, wait. I really we suggest we stay "v2 or later", if that's what we were using, until we hit OSGeo. Then we can switch to the "swiss cheese license" for all I care but I'd like to not muddy things for now. It should only be another decade or so before we emerge from incubation... --adrian On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 13:12 -0700, Graham Davis wrote: > Okay. How do I go about getting a consensus from "everyone involved"? > > Graham > > > Chris Holmes wrote: > > >Afaik we're at LGPL v2. It's probably one that says version 2 or later, > >which means anyone's allowed to do the upgrade to version 3. But we > >should decide as a project if we want to, get consensus from everyone > >involved. > > > >As far as I know v3 has no major downside and has a nice upside that helps > >us - compatibility with apache license. So I'm definitely for upgrading > >to v3. > > > >best regards, > > > >Chris > > > >On Tue, July 17, 2007 2:33 pm, Graham Davis wrote: > > > > > >>I'm starting work on the IP review for the geometry module (not fun!) > >>and noticed that the LICENSE.txt file seems to have the LGPL v2.1 text in > >>it. The POM file for my module however, links to: > >>http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.txt which is version 3. Should the > >>LICENSE.txt files be updated with this new text from the v3 file? > >> > >> > >>-- > >>Graham Davis > >>Refractions Research Inc. > >>gd...@re... > >> > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > >>Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > >>control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > >>http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Geotools-devel mailing list > >>Geo...@li... > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > >> > >> > >>!DSPAM:4005,469d0c9570262143011171! > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > |