Re: [Geotools-devel] Re: JScience 3

[Jody G. <jga...@re...>]

Clint Lewis wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> that is great the javax.units part is what i need. I am work on 
> Susceptance and would like to define it in a way that is compatible 
> with JScience, much the same way you did SEXAGESIMAL_DMS in geotools 
> Units.
>
> If we not using JScience3 then what Java Docs should I be using to 
> find out what is there for my example. 
I have put the latest JScience into lists.refractions.net, I am really 
very impressed with the Quantity side of things (aka the the part that 
is not Units). It appears to be a nice implementation of a "units" 
system like I have always imagined after reading "Analysis Patterns" ... 
Fowler.  That may or may not be a good thing as every later book he 
writes as a more and more simple example of the same idea: 
Quantity/Unit, Measure, Currency, Money.

Martin is there any chance we can take the good part of JScience3 and 
just skip out on their implementation of ordinates?
Jody