From: Sean G. <se...@sm...> - 2003-10-01 11:27:33
|
That sounds perfect. Opinions IanS?? Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Geoghegan, Sean a écrit : > >> When IanT made changes to the Oracle Datasource to turn LineStrings >> and Polygons into MultiLineStrings and MultiPolygons he created a >> dependancy on JTSUtilities in shapefile datasource. I'd rather not >> have this dependancy so can anyone think of a place to move >> JTSutilities to? Maybe resources?? > > > All right for resources for me. But then, should we change the > package? Current package is org.geotools.data.shapefile.shp. What > about org.geotools.resources (which means that JTSUtilities would be > hidden in the javadoc; it would be utilities for Geotools only, not > commited for future version since it may changes with future JTS > version or once we will use GeoAPI). > > Martin. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > |