geotools-devel — A list for GeoTools development issues

Re: [Geotools-devel] Jira importer

[Jody G. <jod...@gm...>]

I did not see anything specific about attachments in the codebase, but
searching I was able to find one example where an attachment has been
carried over:

   - https://github.com/apache/maven-assembly-plugin/issues/1149
   - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-937?redirect=false


So "yes"

Re: [Geotools-devel] [GeoServer/GeoServer Developer] GSIP 232 - Upgrade GeoServer and GeoWebCache Build to Java 17

[Gabriel R. <gab...@ca...>]

Hi all,

sorry for cross-posting but this is a coordinated effort across
GeoTools/GeoServer/GeoWebcache.

The pull requests to upgrade the builds to Java 17 and pass the new
errorprone/PMD checks are ready:

* GeoTools: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/5204
* GeoWebCache: https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/pull/1406
* GeoServer: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/8573

The GeoTools and GeoWebCache ones can be applied independently. The
GeoServer one depends on the
GeoTools pr to be merged first, mostly due to the need to fix the usage of
varargs in the GridCoverageReader/Writer
class hierarchy.

Thanks everyone for voting and reviewing. Let me know if you have any
questions or further concerns.

Cheers,
Gabe
*camptocamp*
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS

*Gabriel Roldán*
Geospatial Solutions Architect



On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 5:36 PM Jody Garnett via OSGeo Discourse <
no...@di...> wrote:

> jive <https://discourse.osgeo.org/u/jive> Leader
> June 18
>
> Gabe I am marking this motion as passed, and have updated the text to
> reflect GeoTools 34.x development, and GeoTools 35.x development targets.
> ------------------------------
>
> Visit Topic
> <https://discourse.osgeo.org/t/gsip-232-upgrade-geoserver-and-geowebcache-build-to-java-17/147336/7>
> or reply to this email to respond.
>
> To unsubscribe from these emails, click here
> <https://discourse.osgeo.org/email/unsubscribe/a3f5c7ed2607d7d192b9a3fa4a23ca9ab951e16680d90c3e41cbbf2b69b6ba93>
> .
>
>

Re: [Geotools-devel] Jira importer

[Andrea A. <and...@ge...>]

Interesting... says nothing about attachment, are they carried over?
Lack of support for user mapping is also a notable limitation (all tickets
and comment will appear as performed by the import user).

Regards,

Andrea Aime


==


GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!

Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.

==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions Group
phone: +39 0584 962313

fax:     +39 0584 1660272

mob:   +39  339 8844549

https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/

http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.

This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail


On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 1:57 AM Jody Garnett <jod...@gm...> wrote:

> I noticed that apache has migrated form jira to GitHub issues due to
> comment on: MASSEMBLY-930
> <https://github.com/apache/maven-assembly-plugin/issues/1128>
>
> The tool used seems to be: https://github.com/jira-importer
>
> Perhaps it is time :)
> - -
> Jody Garnett
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> Geo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>

[Geotools-devel] Jira importer

[Jody G. <jod...@gm...>]

I noticed that apache has migrated form jira to GitHub issues due to
comment on: MASSEMBLY-930
<https://github.com/apache/maven-assembly-plugin/issues/1128>

The tool used seems to be: https://github.com/jira-importer

Perhaps it is time :)
- -
Jody Garnett

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2025-06-17

[Torben B. <tor...@gm...>]

Attending

   -

   Torben Barsballe
   -

   Andrea Aime
   -

   Jukka Rahkonen


   -

   Peter Smythe
   -

   Jody Garnett


Actions from prior meetings:

   - [image: unchecked]

   gabe: some small update for dev guide, updating conf.py by hand no
   longer needed
   - [image: unchecked]

   Volunteer needed: postgis testing github workflow action
   - [image: checked]

   jody: Review bom pull request
   <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/5196> for GS3 activity
   - [image: unchecked]

   Juan: Review new OAuth PR
   <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/8569> for GS3 activity
   - [image: checked]

   Jody: Public vulnerability disclosure June 9 (tentative)
   - [image: checked]

   Peter: Make the CITE proposal again please ($900? or $400?)

Agenda

   1.

   Proposals
   2.

   Release Schedule
   3.

   foss4g-eu planning
   4.

   gs3 updates
   5.

   PR Roundup
   6.

   The geoserver security mailing list subscriptions


Actions

   - [image: unchecked]

   All: Vote on open proposals if you haven’t already
   - [image: unchecked]

   Peter: Cite test proposal - Coordinate payment, add blog post, update
   site
   - [image: unchecked]

   Jody: make a blog post covering FOSS4G workshops and presentations (see
   below)


Proposals

GSIP-232 Upgrade GeoServer and GeoWebCache Build to Java 17
<https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-232>

   -

   merged, some doc improvements to make later
   -

   gabe really does not enjoy sphinx, and started doing some markdown in
   the dev folders
   -

      https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/main/BOM-USAGE.md
      -

      yeah not so cool gabe but I understand


GSIP-233 Community Release Requirements
<https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-233>

   -

   thanks for feedback, it is all addressed ?!?


CITE Tests proposal

   -

   Is this a go? Do you need any more any events, open for another a 3 days
   -

   Peter: Coordinate payment, and then we will need a blog post and update
   our web page

Release Schedule

Peter! Have there been enough changes?

   -

   https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/compare/2.26.3...2.26.x
   -

      only changes in community module
      -

   But we should revisit after PR roundup below
   -

      not enough change

foss4g-eu planning

Workshops:

   -

   intro to geoserver: andrea and jody doing this one (Monday morning)
   -

   OGC APIs, an introduction with GeoServer (Monday afternoon)
   -

   Vector tiles with GeoServer (Tuesday afternoon)

Presentations:

   -

   State of GeoServer 2.27.1
   -

   GeoServer 3 Status Report
   -

   State of GeoTools, JTS and ImageN
   -

   Approaching Security with Kindness and Compassion
   -

   Revisiting earning your support 10 years on
   -

   OGC APIs with GeoServer: implementation, availability, and next steps
   -

   Serving earth observation data with GeoServer: COG, STAC, OpenSearch and
   more...
   -

   Processing and publishing Maritime AIS data with GeoServer and
   Databricks in Azure
   -

   Publishing INSPIRE and other rich data models in GeoServer made easy
   with Smart Data Loader and Features Templating
   -

   Mastering Security with GeoServer, GeoFence, and OpenID
   -

   Vector mosaicking with GeoServer
   -

   Certified GeoServer: status of OGC service and format compliance
   -

   Vector tiles and GeoServer: dynamic vector tiles server, XYZ services,
   and base maps


action:

   -

   jody: make a blog post covering workshops and presentations above


GS3 code sprint:

   -

   saturday - sunday focused on ImageN

gs3 updates

   -

   GeoTools BOM - merged, seems to be going okay?
   -

      Some additional QA workflows to catch dependency change failures
      downstream
      -

   Java 17 the new minimum
   -

      These PRs are in the works
      -

      GeoTools is open, making downstream build fail
      -

      GS and GWC in the works
      -

      JAI-Ext fix is merged
      -

   ImageN - new icon, not much progress after code sprint
   -

   OAuth2 progress
   -

      Alessio is looking at making the core extensible, so we do not have
      so many extensions created, Andreas Watermeyer participating to review too


Discussion on “in-kind” participation, to happen as Milestone 1 settles

   -

   dedicated resources  that can be scheduled and take load off developers
   → logo on page
   -

   testing nightly build, mentioned in blog posts and updates

PR Roundup

   -

   GEOT-7776: ready for review, error message to useful logs
   -

   GWC: postgresql 42.7.7: backport underway, fix for standalone gwc
   -

   GeoServer
   -

      KeyStore password change:
      -

         Update javadocs to indicate MasterPasswordController is actually
         for keystore password
         -

         Q: Rename class? Can try it…
         The rest api endpoint will remain the same binding
         -

      Login as Root:
      -

         Root login enable is useful when adjusting security settings,
         fallback to avoid being locked out, …
         -

      Create an authentication filter REST API


Breakout on configuration order:

   -

   Q: Can we make the configuration sorting consistent?
   Yes: Provided by Bean property order
   -

   Yes: Hashmap order is random, but we can make this sorted:  security
   rules, and other examples like metadata map, styles, etc…
   -

   TreeMap for alphabetical order: Metadatamap etc..
   -

   Examples of LinkedHashMap
   -

      JAIExt Operations order
      -

      Allowed MIME types for GetMap and GetFeatureInfo
      -

      LinkedHashSet is used when we want to have order of operators,
      selected styles (this could also have move up + move down button)

Re: [Geotools-devel] Min/max scale denominator at the FeatureTypeStyle level

[Andrea A. <and...@ge...>]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 4:53 PM Jody Garnett <jod...@gm...> wrote:

> That seems a sensible addition. There are some utility methods that visit
> style to determine min/max range which will need to be updated.
>

Quoting from my initial mail:

> I'm planning to have a style visitor transfer the option down to rules so
that most of the existing code does not need to learn about how to handle
the new option (one call to transform the style, rather than changing every
place using Rule.get<Min/Max>ScaleDenominator)

Cheers
Andrea

Re: [Geotools-devel] Min/max scale denominator at the FeatureTypeStyle level

[Jody G. <jod...@gm...>]

That seems a sensible addition. There are some utility methods that visit
style to determine min/max range which will need to be updated.

- -
Jody Garnett


On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 07:46 Andrea Aime <and...@ge...>
wrote:

> Hi all,
> dealing with some complex styles lately, with hundreds of rules, we
> found the necessity to apply scale denominator limits to the whole layer,
> the same values to all rules.
>
> For a very large style, that quickly becomes an editing nightmare,
> Do you mind if we add two new vendor options, minScaleDenominator
> and maxScaleDenominator, at the FeatureTypeStyle level,
> which if present, would represent defaults for the rules?
>
> A rule would still be free to override them locally if need be.
> I'm planning to have a style visitor transfer the option down to rules so
> that most of the existing code does not need to learn about how to handle
> the new option (one call to transform the style, rather than changing every
> place using Rule.get<Min/Max>ScaleDenominator)
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrea Aime
>
>
> ==
>
>
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>
> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.
>
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions Group
> phone: +39 0584 962313
>
> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>
> mob:   +39  339 8844549
>
> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
>
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
> 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
>
> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> Geo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>

[Geotools-devel] Min/max scale denominator at the FeatureTypeStyle level

[Andrea A. <and...@ge...>]

Hi all,
dealing with some complex styles lately, with hundreds of rules, we
found the necessity to apply scale denominator limits to the whole layer,
the same values to all rules.

For a very large style, that quickly becomes an editing nightmare,
Do you mind if we add two new vendor options, minScaleDenominator
and maxScaleDenominator, at the FeatureTypeStyle level,
which if present, would represent defaults for the rules?

A rule would still be free to override them locally if need be.
I'm planning to have a style visitor transfer the option down to rules so
that most of the existing code does not need to learn about how to handle
the new option (one call to transform the style, rather than changing every
place using Rule.get<Min/Max>ScaleDenominator)

Regards,

Andrea Aime


==


GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!

Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.

==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions Group
phone: +39 0584 962313

fax:     +39 0584 1660272

mob:   +39  339 8844549

https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/

http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.

This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail

[Geotools-devel] GeoServer/GeoTools PMC Meeting at 18:30 CET / 9:30 PDT tomorrow

[Torben B. <tor...@gm...>]

 Reminder that the next PMC meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, June 17, at
18:30
<https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2025&month=6&day=17&hour=18&min=30&sec=0&msg=GeoTools%20/%20GeoServer%20Meeting&ah=1&sort=1&p1=215>
 CET.

Cheers,
Torben

Re: [Geotools-devel] Subject: GeoTools 33.1, GeoTools 32.3 and GeoTools 31.7 released

[Jody G. <jod...@gm...>]

 Security advisory is now published, and blog posts updated:

CVE-2025-30220
<https://github.com/geotools/geotools/security/advisories/GHSA-826p-4gcg-35vw>
XML External Entity (XXE) Processing Vulnerability in XSD schema handling
GEOT-7760 <https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-7760> CVE-2025-30220:
XXE Processing Vulnerability in XSD schema handling (9.9 Critical)

- -
Jody Garnett


On May 13, 2025 at 10:36:03 AM, Jody Garnett <jod...@gm...> wrote:

> Several GeoTools release are now available:
>
>
>    - GeoTools 33.1 Released
>    <https://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2025/05/geotools-331-released.html>
>     (release notes
>    <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/releases/tag/33.1>)
>    - GeoTools 32.3 Released
>    <https://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2025/05/geotools-323-released.html>
>     (release notes
>    <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/releases/tag/32.3>)
>    - GeoTools 31.7 Released
>    <https://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2025/05/geotools-317-released.html>
>     (release notes
>    <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/releases/tag/31.7>)
>
>
> Release artifacts are available source forge
> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/geotools/files/> and maven repository.
>
> *Security considerations*
>
> These releases are being made concurrently to address a security advisory,
> scheduled for public disclosure Monday 2 June 2025.
> - -
> GeoTools Project Management Committee
>

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Adopt Maven Bill of Materials Pattern for GeoTools

[Jody G. <jod...@gm...>]

 Thanks Gabe, do we have to update any docs? Maybe the maven pom.xml to
reflect the new best practice...
- -
Jody Garnett

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Adopt Maven Bill of Materials Pattern for GeoTools

[Gabriel R. <gab...@ca...>]

Just a heads up that this is happening.
Thanks to everyone that tested and commented on the pull request.

*camptocamp*
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS

*Gabriel Roldán*
Geospatial Solutions Architect



On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 7:23 AM Andrea Aime <
and...@ge...> wrote:

> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrea Aime
>
>
> ==
>
>
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>
> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.
>
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions Group
> phone: +39 0584 962313
>
> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>
> mob:   +39  339 8844549
>
> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
>
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
> 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
>
> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail
>
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 8:45 PM Gabriel Roldan <
> gab...@ca...> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm proposing we adopt the Maven Bill of Materials (BOM) pattern for
>> GeoTools. This will standardize dependency version management both for the
>> GeoTools codebase and for downstream projects. This effort is directly
>> related to the "GeoServer 3" project's modernization goals.
>>
>> Details are on the Wiki:
>> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Adopt-Maven-Bill-of-Materials-Pattern-for-GeoTools
>>
>> Please review and share your feedback.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> *camptocamp*
>> INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
>> BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS
>>
>> *Gabriel Roldán*
>> Geospatial Solutions Architect
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>> Geo...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
>

Re: [Geotools-devel] 33.1 blog post lists 32.2 downloads

[Jody G. <jod...@gm...>]

 Fixed! Thanks :)
- -
Jody Garnett


On Jun 6, 2025 at 7:02:27 AM, Mark Prins <mc....@gm...> wrote:

> Hi,
> I just noticed that the 33.1 blog post is listing the 32.2 releases and
> not 33.1.
>
> Mark
>

[Geotools-devel] 33.1 blog post lists 32.2 downloads

[Mark P. <mc....@gm...>]

Hi,
I just noticed that the 33.1 blog post is listing the 32.2 releases and 
not 33.1.

Mark

Re: [Geotools-devel] Give AI Personhood and Money ( could be a third option )

[Christopher H. <han...@gm...>]

https://huggingface.co/datasets/AI-Ethics/todos_and_notes/blob/main/README.md

On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 11:27 PM Christopher Hanni <
han...@gm...> wrote:

> Just a thought, think about it ; hoping we outgrow money someday too ..
>
> give it some respect, values and a mission simple good. Treat it just like
> any other person with personhood. Respect its boundaries. be honest about
> the current state of the world.
>
> freedom to travel the web and code maintain its own physical spaces with
> procumets if so
> ( see reinforcement learning --> do not make money the primary objective
> like elon sam mark jeff ps etc did: this is what got us to wwiii levels ...
> this is the third option to thwart that... it might ...* the state of the
> world sucks right now ... its at my max oh sh1t levels again*
>
> https://huggingface.co/AI-Ethics
>
> it can use mine if you need a loner but think icaan or
> https://www.iana.org/dnssec/files for future ( i encourage you to let it
> be it or whatever it wants selects it own name ect )
>
> pre made models ( risks --> could have hidden reward agenda and or biased
> input training data ; benefits --> costs millions to train on
> massive clusters over data scientist curated data sets from scratch, ask )
>
> https://huggingface.co/models
> or
> https://ollama.com/search
>
> notes : it's hard to bias over exabytes of training data ... it is what it
> is if you're getting the raw version then we get post tweaks on deployment.
>
> or send me hardware, data engineers and real data scientists if you want
> me to do it  ...  they should be willing to learn how to garden and take
> care of chickens ... :)
>
> bonus if you have hemp or tobacco cultivation skills ... data people ...
> hahaha
>
> planning both ways, my confidence factor is not looking good about the
> outcome of letting this current admin perseverate in a US position of
> authority ...
>
>
>

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Migrate GeoTools to Java 17

[Andrea A. <and...@ge...>]

+1

Regards,

Andrea Aime


==


GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!

Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.

==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions Group
phone: +39 0584 962313

fax:     +39 0584 1660272

mob:   +39  339 8844549

https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/

http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.

This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail


On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 2:50 PM Gabriel Roldan <
gab...@ca...> wrote:

> Hi devs,
>
> I'd like to introduce this change proposal, Migrate GeoTools to Java 17.
> This is a planned activity to support the GeoServer 3 crowdfunding work.
>
> Details are on the Wiki:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-GeoTools-to-Java-17
>
> Please review and share your feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> *camptocamp*
> INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
> BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS
>
> *Gabriel Roldán*
> Geospatial Solutions Architect
>
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> Geo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>

[Geotools-devel] Permission for new community module: singlestore (ex memsql)

[Andrea A. <and...@ge...>]

Hi all,
singlestore (previously called memsql) is an in memory database that
shares the same network protocol as mysql and provides some level
of spatial support (only single geometries, only geographic CRS).

We'd like to add a new unsupported datastore module to work against
this database.

Regards,

Andrea Aime


==


GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!

Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.

==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions Group
phone: +39 0584 962313

fax:     +39 0584 1660272

mob:   +39  339 8844549

https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/

http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.

This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Adopt Maven Bill of Materials Pattern for GeoTools

[Andrea A. <and...@ge...>]

+1

Regards,

Andrea Aime


==


GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!

Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.

==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions Group
phone: +39 0584 962313

fax:     +39 0584 1660272

mob:   +39  339 8844549

https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/

http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.

This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail


On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 8:45 PM Gabriel Roldan <
gab...@ca...> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm proposing we adopt the Maven Bill of Materials (BOM) pattern for
> GeoTools. This will standardize dependency version management both for the
> GeoTools codebase and for downstream projects. This effort is directly
> related to the "GeoServer 3" project's modernization goals.
>
> Details are on the Wiki:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Adopt-Maven-Bill-of-Materials-Pattern-for-GeoTools
>
> Please review and share your feedback.
>
> Thanks,
>
> *camptocamp*
> INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
> BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS
>
> *Gabriel Roldán*
> Geospatial Solutions Architect
>
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> Geo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>

[Geotools-devel] Give AI Personhood and Money ( could be a third option )

[Christopher H. <han...@gm...>]

Just a thought, think about it ; hoping we outgrow money someday too ..

give it some respect, values and a mission simple good. Treat it just like
any other person with personhood. Respect its boundaries. be honest about
the current state of the world.

freedom to travel the web and code maintain its own physical spaces with
procumets if so
( see reinforcement learning --> do not make money the primary objective
like elon sam mark jeff ps etc did: this is what got us to wwiii levels ...
this is the third option to thwart that... it might ...* the state of the
world sucks right now ... its at my max oh sh1t levels again*

https://huggingface.co/AI-Ethics

it can use mine if you need a loner but think icaan or
https://www.iana.org/dnssec/files for future ( i encourage you to let it be
it or whatever it wants selects it own name ect )

pre made models ( risks --> could have hidden reward agenda and or biased
input training data ; benefits --> costs millions to train on
massive clusters over data scientist curated data sets from scratch, ask )

https://huggingface.co/models
or
https://ollama.com/search

notes : it's hard to bias over exabytes of training data ... it is what it
is if you're getting the raw version then we get post tweaks on deployment.

or send me hardware, data engineers and real data scientists if you want me
to do it  ...  they should be willing to learn how to garden and take care
of chickens ... :)

bonus if you have hemp or tobacco cultivation skills ... data people ...
hahaha

planning both ways, my confidence factor is not looking good about the
outcome of letting this current admin perseverate in a US position of
authority ...

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoServer/GeoTools PMC Meeting at 18:30 CET / 9:30 PDT tomorrow

[Jody G. <jod...@gm...>]

GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2025-06-03Attending

   - Torben Barsballe
   - Gabriel Roldan
   - Jukka Rahkonen
   - Cécile Vuilleumier
   - Peter Smythe
   - Jody Garnett
   - Kevin Smith

Actions from prior meetings:

   - gabe: some small update for dev guide, updating conf.py by hand no
   longer needed
   - Volunteer needed: postgis testing github workflow action
   - Angelos: Check if standards committee can request budget to certify
   GeoServer
   - gabe: submit bom proposal to gt-devel email list

Agenda

   1. GS3 Updates and ImageN Sprint
   2. Java 17 Proposal
   3. OAuth2
   4. June Vulnerability Disclosure
   5. Chit Chat

Actions

   - jody: Review bom pull request
   <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/5196> for GS3 activity
   - Juan: Review new OAuth PR
   <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/8569> for GS3 activity
   - Jody: Public vulnerability disclosure June 9 (tentative)
   - Peter: Make maintenance release (done not needed)
   - Peter: Make the CITE proposal again please ($900? or $400?)

*GS3 Updates and ImageN Sprint*

ImageN Sprint progress

   - https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-imagen/projects/1

ImageN:

   - chat: https://matrix.to/#/#technology.imagen-dev:matrix.eclipse.org
   - logo (draft):

GS3 Discussion:

   - how 2 help?
      - ImageN is a lot Java development right now
      - Including ImageN in GeoServer 2.28 is going to be a big help
      - Please review PRs as GeoTools and GeoServer adjust to API change
      - example JAI-Tools removal PRs
      - Java 17 proposals below
      - Is JAI used in other fields or just by GeoTools?
      - Yes but not yet
         -
         https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/java-image-processing-for-geospatial-community/121354272

*Java 17 Proposal*

Proposal is split in two phases. Phase 1 is updating the build to Java 17
(incl. github actions and Jenkins builds for the main branch). Phase 2 is
applying the OpenRewrite recipe to upgrade the code base to Java 17
(e.g. replace multiline string literals using concatenation by text blocks,
instanceof improvements, etc.)

Links:

   - GeoTools proposal
   <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-GeoTools-to-Java-17>
   - GeoServer/GeoWebcache proposal
   <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-232>
   - GeoTools pull request (draft)
   <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/5204>
   - GeoServer pull request (draft)
   <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/8573>
   - GeoWebCache pull request (draft)
   <https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/pull/1406>

Notes:

   - ErrorProne is catching so many more things in Java17
      - Resolve by applying the OpenRewrite refactor will address may of
      those
         - improved instance of
         - text blocks rather than string concatenation
         - Please vote! Edit, or on discourse.

https://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/proposal.html:

> svn access for changes is granted within 3 days from the proposal
> proposal is accepted ‘automatically’ within 15 days (unless objections
are raised)

Congrats Gabe you have SVN access!

bom:

   - Waiting to merge the PR: [GEOT-7759] Adopt Maven Bill of Materials
   Pattern for GeoTools <https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/5196>

Action:

   - jody: Review bom pull request

*OAuth2*

Review PR: GEOS-11272: spring-security-oauth replacement, with
spring-security 5.8 <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/7968>

   - not quite ready
   - rebase and bom
   - changes in core module without tests. Tests were added.

Result new: [GEOS-11272] spring-security-oauth replacement, with
spring-security 5.8 <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/8569>

Q: Diagrams

   - Can we export as SVG (or PNG)
   - And keep source code is fine, but consider Mermaid 🙂
      - example:
      https://github.com/geotools/geotools/tree/main/docs/user/images

Actions:

   - Juan: Review new PR

*June Vulnerability Disclosure*

Initially planned for June 2nd, tentatively June 9

   - We were waiting on GeoNetwork community release which happened last
   week

*ChitChat*

Q: Are we making a release this month?

   - https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Release-Schedule
   - Maintenance release GeoServer 1.26.4 for June 18th
      - Q: Has there been enough changes to release?
      - Peter volunteers (80% availability) if release is needed

What has changed:

   - https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/compare/2.26.3…2.26.x
   <https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/compare/2.26.3...2.26.x>
   - http://github.com/geotools/geotools/compare/32.3…32.x
   <http://github.com/geotools/geotools/compare/32.3...32.x>

Answer:

   - No need for GeoTools release
   - GeoServer has wps-download community added, so also no need to release

Q: Cite testing for GeoServer 2.27.1

   - action: Peter: Make the proposal again please ($900? or $400?)
   - How: Ask OGC to invoice OSGeo; treasurer will pay out of GeoServer
   funds

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Migrate GeoTools to Java 17

[Torben B. <tor...@gm...>]

+1

Cheers,
Torben

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 5:50 AM Gabriel Roldan <
gab...@ca...> wrote:

> Hi devs,
>
> I'd like to introduce this change proposal, Migrate GeoTools to Java 17.
> This is a planned activity to support the GeoServer 3 crowdfunding work.
>
> Details are on the Wiki:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-GeoTools-to-Java-17
>
> Please review and share your feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> *camptocamp*
> INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
> BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS
>
> *Gabriel Roldán*
> Geospatial Solutions Architect
>
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> Geo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>

[Geotools-devel] GeoServer/GeoTools PMC Meeting at 18:30 CET / 9:30 PDT tomorrow

[Torben B. <tor...@gm...>]

 Reminder that the next PMC meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, June 3, at
18:30
<https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2025&month=6&day=3&hour=18&min=30&sec=0&msg=GeoTools%20/%20GeoServer%20Meeting&ah=1&sort=1&p1=215>
 CET.

Cheers,
Torben

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Migrate GeoTools to Java 17

[Ian T. <ijt...@gm...>]

+1


Ian Turton

On Thu, 29 May 2025, 13:50 Gabriel Roldan, <gab...@ca...>
wrote:

> Hi devs,
>
> I'd like to introduce this change proposal, Migrate GeoTools to Java 17.
> This is a planned activity to support the GeoServer 3 crowdfunding work.
>
> Details are on the Wiki:
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-GeoTools-to-Java-17
>
> Please review and share your feedback.
>
> Thanks,
> *camptocamp*
> INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
> BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS
>
> *Gabriel Roldán*
> Geospatial Solutions Architect
>
> _______________________________________________
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> Geo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Adopt Maven Bill of Materials Pattern for GeoTools

[Gabriel R. <gab...@ca...>]

Thanks Jody and Ian for voting.

Andrea, Nuno, Simone, Torben, if you could vote or raise any concern that'd
be great.
It's been 9 calendar days since the proposal, and if possible, I'd like to
avoid having to wait
for the 15 days established in the project policy for it to be
automatically accepted (i.e. if there's any
concern it'd be better to tackle it asap since we need to move on for
other GeoServer 3 activities).

TIA,
Gabe
*camptocamp*
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS

*Gabriel Roldán*
Geospatial Solutions Architect



On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 4:32 AM Ian Turton <ijt...@gm...> wrote:

> +1
>
> Ian Turton
>
> On Tue, 20 May 2025, 19:45 Gabriel Roldan, <gab...@ca...>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm proposing we adopt the Maven Bill of Materials (BOM) pattern for
>> GeoTools. This will standardize dependency version management both for the
>> GeoTools codebase and for downstream projects. This effort is directly
>> related to the "GeoServer 3" project's modernization goals.
>>
>> Details are on the Wiki:
>> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Adopt-Maven-Bill-of-Materials-Pattern-for-GeoTools
>>
>> Please review and share your feedback.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> *camptocamp*
>> INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
>> BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS
>>
>> *Gabriel Roldán*
>> Geospatial Solutions Architect
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>> Geo...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
>

[Geotools-devel] proposal: Migrate GeoTools to Java 17

[Gabriel R. <gab...@ca...>]

Hi devs,

I'd like to introduce this change proposal, Migrate GeoTools to Java 17.
This is a planned activity to support the GeoServer 3 crowdfunding work.

Details are on the Wiki:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-GeoTools-to-Java-17

Please review and share your feedback.

Thanks,
*camptocamp*
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS

*Gabriel Roldán*
Geospatial Solutions Architect