Recent changes to Why

Why modified by Vladimir Chukharev

Vladimir Chukharev — Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:49:11 -0000

--- v4
+++ v5
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@

 I am designing a stamp matrix. There is a reason why I do it myself rather than just order from some design company. The shape is fine but regular, though quite different in different parts of the matrix. A simple approach is to write a script in Python defining the shape of each of the matrix parts. This task is much simpler with a good library. I looked around using Google for few days, turned down all found candidates, and started to write my own. After a week or so of leisure development, it has more complete set of features than any of those rejected candidates.

-Meanwhile I continued looking for alternatives. Yesterday, I found that FreeCAD might be, actually, a good enough tool for the whole problem. Moreover, recently a porting to my OS effort was started. I tested the proposed port, and it works. So, at the moment it looks like I do not need to continue with the library. Just for a case, I decided to store it on SourceForge.
+Meanwhile I continued looking for alternatives. Yesterday, I found that FreeCAD might be, actually, a good enough tool for the whole problem. Moreover, recently a porting to my OS effort was started. I tested the proposed port, and found that it works. So, at the moment it looks like I do not need to continue with the library. Just for a case, I decided to store it on SourceForge.

Why modified by Vladimir Chukharev

Vladimir Chukharev — Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:49:47 -0000

--- v3
+++ v4
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@

 I am designing a stamp matrix. There is a reason why I do it myself rather than just order from some design company. The shape is fine but regular, though quite different in different parts of the matrix. A simple approach is to write a script in Python defining the shape of each of the matrix parts. This task is much simpler with a good library. I looked around using Google for few days, turned down all found candidates, and started to write my own. After a week or so of leisure development, it has more complete set of features than any of those rejected candidates.

-Meanwhile I continued looking for alternatives. Yesterday, I found that FreeCAD might be, actually, a good enough tool for the whole problem. Moreover, recently a porting to my OS effort was started. I tested the proposed port, and it works. So, at the moment it looks like do not need to continue with the library. Just for a case, I decided to store it on SourceForge.
+Meanwhile I continued looking for alternatives. Yesterday, I found that FreeCAD might be, actually, a good enough tool for the whole problem. Moreover, recently a porting to my OS effort was started. I tested the proposed port, and it works. So, at the moment it looks like I do not need to continue with the library. Just for a case, I decided to store it on SourceForge.

Discussion for Why page

Vladimir Chukharev — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:54:15 -0000

Why modified by Vladimir Chukharev

Vladimir Chukharev — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:08:26 -0000

--- v2
+++ v3
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@

 I am designing a stamp matrix. There is a reason why I do it myself rather than just order from some design company. The shape is fine but regular, though quite different in different parts of the matrix. A simple approach is to write a script in Python defining the shape of each of the matrix parts. This task is much simpler with a good library. I looked around using Google for few days, turned down all found candidates, and started to write my own. After a week or so of leisure development, it has more complete set of features than any of those rejected candidates.

-Meanwhile I continued looking for alternatives. Yesterday, I found that FreeCAD might be actually good enough tool for the whole problem. Moreover, recently a porting to my OS effort was started. I tested the proposed port, and it works. So, at the moment it looks like do not need to continue with the library. Just for a case, I decided to store it of SourceForge.
+Meanwhile I continued looking for alternatives. Yesterday, I found that FreeCAD might be, actually, a good enough tool for the whole problem. Moreover, recently a porting to my OS effort was started. I tested the proposed port, and it works. So, at the moment it looks like do not need to continue with the library. Just for a case, I decided to store it on SourceForge.

Why modified by Vladimir Chukharev

Vladimir Chukharev — Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:36:46 -0000

Why modified by Vladimir Chukharev

Vladimir Chukharev — Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:35:02 -0000

Why Yet Another 3D Graphics Library

I am designing a stamp matrix. There is a reason why I do it myself rather than just order from some design company. The shape is fine but regular, though quite different in different parts of the matrix. A simple approach is to write a script in Python defining the shape of each of the matrix parts. This task is much simpler with a good library. I looked around using Google for few days, turned down all found candidates, and started to write my own. After a week or so of leisure development, it has more complete set of features than any of those rejected candidates.

Meanwhile I continued looking for alternatives. Yesterday, I found that FreeCAD might be actually good enough tool for the whole problem. Moreover, recently a porting to my OS effort was started. I tested the proposed port, and it works. So, at the moment it looks like do not need to continue with the library. Just for a case, I decided to store it of SourceForge.