|
From: jesse c. <cro...@po...> - 2002-12-13 23:43:21
|
should all of these have been changed to use Orientations? if we don't change them, then we're right back in the original mess, depending on JavaDoc to insure that users feed in correctly oriented value using the correct units. RangeBearing is a GeoVector and RelativeRangeBearing is a RelativeCoordinate, so we don't have the problem with defining an Orientation with another Orientation. but RangeBearing and RelativeRangeBearing (maybe others i've missed, oh, prolly RangeBearingAzimuth) have 'bearings' and their Orientation is defined by the documentation. not that i want the extra work, mind you, but if'n we're gonna do this right, then by gosh, we're gonna do it right. jdc |