|
From: Lonny M. <lon...@st...> - 2001-03-18 03:10:21
|
Hi Harry, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry J. Mangalam" <hj...@nc...> To: "Lonny Montoya" <lon...@st...> Cc: <gen...@nc...>; <gen...@so...> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 6:53 PM Subject: Re: Curation Tool Release 1.0 > Hey, Great!! - good job, Lonnie & Todd, > > one thing tho - what's the point of including the FrameMaker files? Could a > user (or developer) actually use them for anything? Would we want them to? > > Only reason I ask is that they take up ~ 13MB of disk.. > The reason for the framemaker files is that our(NCGR) people who maintain the help screens use framemaker for this. They needed (or at least wanted) the original framemaker files to be able to make any changes to the help screens in the future. I think the framemaker files should be removed if one of two things happen: 1) We decide not to maintain the help screens (which are terribly out of date now anyway) internally. 2) Someone outside ncgr (yes, this is a solicitaion to any out there who is interested) decides to update the help files using the html files directly rather than frammaker. Number two, of course would be preferred. > Also, we should have a README for the 1.0 release in the download dir. > > Also, the typical thing for unix-type archives is to assume that they know > how to unpack an tarball and have the instructions inside the tarball as a > README. If they can't do that, they probably shouldn't be playing with this > stuff anyway. > There used to be a README.txt inside the download directory. We decided to remove it for just the reason you mentioned here (and to make it a tiny bit easier for us to post to the download directory). We decided that expanding a .tar.gz or an exe package is a no brainer. The README.txt now appears at the root level of the download package after they expand it, where we think it belongs. That said, I don't feel very strongly one way or the other and I don't think anyone else does either. We can put a copy in the download directory if anyone thinks it is necessary.I > ..ok - that was 3 things... > > Harry 'never satisfied' Mangalam > > Lonny > > On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Lonny Montoya wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > The Genex Curation Tool (Release 1.0) is now available for download on the > > Genex website: > > > > http://genex.ncgr.org/genex/download/curation_tool/ > > > > This release has a few new features and several new bug fixes. Please try > > the download and report any problems you may have installing or using it to: > > > > gen...@nc... > > > > Thank You, > > > > Lonny Montoya > > Genex Developer > > > > > |