|
From: <ja...@op...> - 2001-03-09 20:07:26
|
"Greg D. Colello" <gd...@nc...> writes: > >Before anyone can add an array-layout into the DB the species for all > >their USF must first exist in the DB. > > > >I have no problem removing species without SF, and especially those > >that we never will, like Red Kangaroo. They were put there to help the > >CT folks test out the organism table. > > Hmmm. I thought the point of the species table being rather thorough was to > avoid having to add species all the time as new dtasets appeared. Also looks > more professional. I though Carol vetted the list to be those species most > likely to succeed? No, they were chosen so that one species from each general_classification appeared in the pull-down menu in the CT. > And, while we're talking about species, let's go the other direction > towards more species. These species, which are not in our species > table, have spots on the Stanford microarrays (they also have Homo > sapiens, Escheria coli, and of course Arabidopsis thaliana): > > Streptomyces hygroscopicus > Bacillus thuringiensis > Aequorea victoria > Photinus pyralis > > Can't load the data properly until these are in the species table > and appear in the Control Bundle. In the short run I was thinking of > taking an old Control Bundle and patching it by hand to include > these new species, but I gotta fake the species id. Do we need to > talk Jason? That would be yes. The template XML file for adding a new species is in CVS. On genebox that would be: setenv CVSROOT gdc@genebox:/home/cvsroot/opengenex cvs co analysis_scripts_install/Genex/data/db_tables/species.xml Provide an XML file in that format, and it will be entered into the DB. jas. |