|
From: Greg D. C. <gd...@nc...> - 2001-02-01 03:29:36
|
I'm sure Jason would applaud this idea. He has been saying the same thing since 6 months ago. Greg >From: "Todd Peterson" <tf...@nc...> >To: <gen...@li...> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-Priority: 3 >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 >Subject: [GeneX-dev] Controlled Vocabs in DB >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:06:35 -0700 > >Having a separate table for each control vocabulary is extremely tedious. I propose the following table structure: > >table: > ControlVocabulary >attributes: > vocabulary_name varchar(80) NOT NULL > term_string varchar(48) NOT NULL > description text > >Advantages: less tables which all have the same structure. less maintenance. generic. code simplification. >Disadvantages: code changes in DB2XML, XML2DB, control bundle generator. GeneXML should NOT change. > >I realize this is probably something for redesign but wanted to get thoughts churning. |