Re: [GeneX-dev] Bug tracking on sourceforge

[Lonnie M. <lx...@nc...>]

I agree with Harry, letsleave it like it is in sourceforge.

Lonny


> 
> "Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> > What do people feel. I think that 9 priorities are pointless, there
> > are at least 3 that will never get used.
> 
> 9 categories are useless.  Probably 6 are too many; 4 is about right, but I don't really care too much; I'll ignore all less than the top 2 :).
> 
> Re: the priority numbering inversion.  Not enough confusion to worry about.  We're big boys. We can count up as well as down.  In conversation, refer to HIGH priority vs low pri and the point will be
> made.
> 
> 
> 
> > Todd, if you're suggesting that we switch the SF priority scheme so
> > that 1 is high and 9 is low, that might be a problem. Since that
> > information is auto-generated by the SF scripts, we cannot change
> > it. That means users that examine our bug list will see all theses
> > priority one bugs, which sourceforge claims is *low* priority.
> > 
> > Perhaps what we want is to map:
> > 
> > Genex                                  SourceForge
> > Bugzilla:                              Bug track
> > 
> > P0: Critical Failure                   9:
> >     Must Fix Immediately
> > P1  Major Bug                          8:
> >     Must fix in this release
> > P2  Important Bug                      7:
> >     Fix in this release if possible
> > P3  Minor Bug                          6:
> >     Fix in next release
> > P4  Minor Bug                          --
> >     (redundant with P3)
> > P5  Don't work on unless instructed    5: (or 1:)?
> > 
> > jas.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Genex-dev mailing list
> > Gen...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/genex-dev
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Harry
> 
> Harry J Mangalam -- (949) 856 2847 (v&f) -- hj...@nc... || man...@ho...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Genex-dev mailing list
> Gen...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/genex-dev
>