Re: [GeneX-dev] Bug tracking on sourceforge

[Todd P. <tf...@nc...>]

Whatever is simplest to implement and avoids any confusion is ok with me.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jason E. Stewart" <ja...@op...>
To: <gen...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [GeneX-dev] Bug tracking on sourceforge


> "Todd Peterson" <tf...@nc...> writes:
> 
> > The current bug system on SF has the priorities annotated with the
> > following:
> > 
> > 1 Lowest
> > ...
> > 5 Medium
> > ...
> > 9 Highest
> > 
> > This is opposite to the scheme below. Can we change the Lowest, Medium,
> > Highest to our own interpretations?
> 
> What do people feel. I think that 9 priorities are pointless, there
> are at least 3 that will never get used. 
> 
> Todd, if you're suggesting that we switch the SF priority scheme so
> that 1 is high and 9 is low, that might be a problem. Since that
> information is auto-generated by the SF scripts, we cannot change
> it. That means users that examine our bug list will see all theses
> priority one bugs, which sourceforge claims is *low* priority. 
> 
> Perhaps what we want is to map:
> 
> Genex                                  SourceForge
> Bugzilla:                              Bug track
> 
> P0: Critical Failure                   9:
>     Must Fix Immediately
> P1  Major Bug                          8:
>     Must fix in this release           
> P2  Important Bug                      7:
>     Fix in this release if possible    
> P3  Minor Bug                          6:
>     Fix in next release                
> P4  Minor Bug                          --
>     (redundant with P3)
> P5  Don't work on unless instructed    5: (or 1:)?
> 
> jas.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Genex-dev mailing list
> Gen...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/genex-dev
>