Re: [GeneX-dev] Bug tracking on sourceforge

[<ja...@op...>]

"Todd Peterson" <tf...@nc...> writes:

> The current bug system on SF has the priorities annotated with the
> following:
> 
> 1 Lowest
> ...
> 5 Medium
> ...
> 9 Highest
> 
> This is opposite to the scheme below. Can we change the Lowest, Medium,
> Highest to our own interpretations?

What do people feel. I think that 9 priorities are pointless, there
are at least 3 that will never get used. 

Todd, if you're suggesting that we switch the SF priority scheme so
that 1 is high and 9 is low, that might be a problem. Since that
information is auto-generated by the SF scripts, we cannot change
it. That means users that examine our bug list will see all theses
priority one bugs, which sourceforge claims is *low* priority. 

Perhaps what we want is to map:

Genex                                  SourceForge
Bugzilla:                              Bug track

P0: Critical Failure                   9:
    Must Fix Immediately
P1  Major Bug                          8:
    Must fix in this release           
P2  Important Bug                      7:
    Fix in this release if possible    
P3  Minor Bug                          6:
    Fix in next release                
P4  Minor Bug                          --
    (redundant with P3)
P5  Don't work on unless instructed    5: (or 1:)?

jas.