|
From: <ja...@op...> - 2001-01-30 17:29:02
|
"Todd Peterson" <tf...@nc...> writes: > > Genex.pm is (to me) very descriptive. It is *only* the Perl API > > module. It is mainly a category for me to refile bugs under when > > someone reports a problem in the Server that I find is really an issue > > with the API. > > > How about GeneX Perl API then? I Could have used that. I have been using Genex.pm as a description for the entire piece, much like we talk about DBI.pm or CGI.pm, although they are certainly more well known. > > The genex-analysis/genex-query are very fuzzy things that overlap > > quite a bit. That's why I registered it as just 'Server', which > > includes all the CGI scripts, and the WWW pages that come with the > > server. > > GeneX Server then? It is the GeneX project, who's server would I be talking about? When the bugzilla items were shared between many projects at NCGR there was a need to preface them with a project name. Since this bug tracker is specific to Genex, why add them? just my $0.05, jas. PS. Unfortunately, once items are in the list, you have to make an SA request to remove them. So unless someone feels really strongly that the ones I added are incorrect, we may want to keep them. The sourceforge SA's seem to take about 2 weeks to handle requests such as that. |