From: Cameron S. <ca...@sh...> - 2003-09-13 04:17:04
|
On Friday 12 Sep 2003 3:55 pm, Sean Wheller wrote: > > 2. Commented entities are difficult to work with, > > but it is closely associated It seems Sean misunderstands our attitude to commented entities. The reason we are using commented entities is a hack to get around the difficienties of XXE and something we plan to remove as soon as we stop talking and get back to coding. Currently we use: <!--&project_name;--> in our souce text. Pre-processing from the generpublishing script converts this to &project_name; . "project_name" is defined as an entity in guide/resouces/entities.ent What we plan to do is replace the above with xlinks which reference the generconfig.xml file. (I haven't worked out how to do this yet and am not sure if XXE supports it, but I plan to look at it soon). Sean, you are rightly concerned that we are not using standards, and I agree that we need to move back to using standards. (I think this is the only place where we have deviated from standards.) -- With regards to normal Entities from legacy documentation. They can still be used within the current generguide framework. We are not planning to remove this functionality. --- On Saturday 13 Sep 2003 3:28 am, Sean Wheller wrote: > Do we set a standard. In some respects yes. In others > no. When it comes to tools and their technological > functionality. I think NO. When it comes to a > Framework that works with most Publishing Models, I > think YES. I agree. I believe the job of generguide is: 1. Define the interface. Ie Docbook XML using modular docs. 2. Ensure at least one free editor supports this interface and your average tech writer is happy using it. Ie, WYSIWYM, edits docbook xml, supports modular documents. 3. Provide publishing tools. -- Cameron Shorter http://cameron.shorter.net Open Source Developer http://generguide.sourceforge.net http://mapbuilder.sourceforge.net http://geotools.org Senior Software Engineer http://www.adi-limited.com |