Re: [generguide-devel] Defining a new generguide DTD

[Cameron S. <ca...@sh...>]

On Monday 23 Jun 2003 10:12 am, Artur Hefczyc wrote:
> What do you think about it?

I love the idea of entities.  I was thinking about setting up a name/value 
config file as well, but this sounds better.

Simple string replacement should be sufficient.  I don't think we need worry 
about looping.
Keeping it simple will make the project more usable by others.

>
> 2. It seems to me I have found a way to define CSS for our DTD extension.
>     So probably displaying our DTD tags will be possible on any
>     WYSIWYG editor.
>     However with entities concept it is not necessary.
>
> 3. References between sections (files). Do we need them or should avoid
> doing it? There is a way to do it. Not directly with SDocBook use, but with
> something like xinclude and additional XML processing tools.

Yes, I was planning to keep references between sections.  But I realise this 
is a problem for validating so am interested to hear any better ideas.  Maybe 
we can remove all links and just say "In the Testing/Junit section we discuss 
this further".

I still think we can use replacement of generic sections with project specific 
sections as well.

-- 
Cameron Shorter              http://shorter.net/cameron
Open Source Developer        http://mapbuilder.sourceforge.net
                             http://geotools.org
Senior Software Engineer     http://www.adi-limited.com/