Menu

#66 PANTHER:PTN000120057

PAINT
closed-fixed
nobody
None
5
2015-02-20
2014-10-09
Jim Hu
No

http://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/GProtein?ac=P54453

Taxon constraints should not allow propagation of GO:0005739
mitochondrion to Bacillus subtilis.

Related

PAINT: #66

Discussion

  • Paola Roncaglia

    Paola Roncaglia - 2014-10-09

    Hi Jim,

    GO:0005739
    mitochondrion

    already has a taxon rule: only in Eukaryotes

    relationship: only_in_taxon NCBITaxon:2759 {id="GOTAX:0000060"} ! Eukaryota

    The QuickGO and UniProt websites are not responding at the moment, so I can't see where the Bacillus subtilis annotation is coming from, but it sounds like an issue with (a missing) taxon check during QC procedures?

    Thanks,
    Paola

     
  • Paola Roncaglia

    Paola Roncaglia - 2014-10-09

    Sorry, clearer now that the QuickGO page loaded fully: the Bacillus annotation is indeed a PAINT one, so PAINT might want to look into their pipeline/implementation of taxon checks in general. Thanks!

    Paola

     
  • Jim Hu

    Jim Hu - 2014-10-09

    Yes, Paola is correct and I should have been clearer in the report. It's a problem with PAINT not catching the taxon constraints that the terms already have, which is why I reported it here instead of on the ontology requests tracker. I found this when a user asked for help extracting a B. subtilis GAF... it just happened to be the first thing I saw in AmiGO when I searched genes and gene products for Bacillus.

    I vaguely remember seeing a similar problem with another PAINT annotation that we imported into the E. coli GAF. In that case the GAF submission QC caught it, so I guess there is also a problem with PAINT annotations not being tested there... or is the file with all of UniProt not checked because it's too big?

     
  • Pascale Gaudet

    Pascale Gaudet - 2014-10-09

    Hi Jim,
    This is a family that was curated a long time ago, before the taxon constraints were implemented. I reopened the family on my machine and will commit a cleaned version.

    We do have reports of a lot of those errors. We should discuss with Chris and other if these annotations that violate the taxon constraints should be filtered put of the GO database. Right now we get an error report, and we need to manually correct them.

    Pascale

     
    • Chris Mungall

      Chris Mungall - 2014-10-09

      Yes, we should filter out violations as part of the GAF publishing
      pipeline (pre loading into GO database)

      Can be discussed next week at these junctures:

      Tuesday
      * Phylogenetic Annotation: Jenkin running of PAINT GAF file updates
      (Suzi)
      * Annotation Workflow: Jenkins GAF QC checks and inferences (Heiko,
      Rama)
      Wednesday
      * Software infrastructure - part 2: Migration of all cron jobs to
      Jenkins - status

      On 9 Oct 2014, at 10:38, Pascale Gaudet wrote:

      Hi Jim,
      This is a family that was curated a long time ago, before the taxon
      constraints were implemented. I reopened the family on my machine and
      will commit a cleaned version.

      We do have reports of a lot of those errors. We should discuss with
      Chris and other if these annotations that violate the taxon
      constraints should be filtered put of the GO database. Right now we
      get an error report, and we need to manually correct them.

      Pascale


      [paint:#66] PANTHER:PTN000120057

      Status: open
      Group: dictyBase
      Created: Thu Oct 09, 2014 02:03 AM UTC by Jim Hu
      Last Updated: Thu Oct 09, 2014 01:53 PM UTC
      Owner: nobody

      http://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/GProtein?ac=P54453

      Taxon constraints should not allow propagation of GO:0005739
      mitochondrion to Bacillus subtilis.


      Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in
      https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/paint/66/

      To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
      https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/

       

      Related

      PAINT: #66

  • Pascale Gaudet

    Pascale Gaudet - 2014-11-05

    I have fixed the offending family. I know we have other taxon constraints violations, we need to check them all.

    Can this issue be closed ?

     
  • Pascale Gaudet

    Pascale Gaudet - 2015-02-20
    • status: open --> closed-fixed
     
  • Pascale Gaudet

    Pascale Gaudet - 2015-02-20
    • Group: dictyBase --> PAINT
     

Log in to post a comment.