replaced-by cardinality violations

The DEPRECATED legacy location of the GO, see http://geneontology.org

Brought to you by: asangrador, benhitz, cmungall, cooperl09, and 20 others

#11786 replaced-by cardinality violations

Milestone: None

Status: open

Owner: Chris Mungall

Labels: None

Priority: 6

Updated: 2015-07-02

Created: 2015-07-02

Creator: Chris Mungall

Private: No

See: http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2015-07-02

1 Attachments

replaced-by-cardinality-more-than-1.txt

Discussion

Chris Mungall - 2015-07-02

assigned_to: Tanya Berardini
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Tanya Berardini - 2015-07-02

Eyeballed. In my opinion, we should substitute 'consider' for all the 'replaced_by' tags.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Tanya Berardini - 2015-07-02

assigned_to: Tanya Berardini --> David Hill
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Tanya Berardini - 2015-07-02

Assigning to you, David, for secondary review. Thanks.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

David Hill - 2015-07-02

assigned_to: David Hill --> Chris Mungall
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

David Hill - 2015-07-02

I agree with Tanya. Some of them are interesting though. It looks like they were at one time compound terms that could be transferred to both.

Back to you Chris.

If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:

Log in to post a comment.