SP_SL:SL-0455 for pombe is mapping to cell septum.
In some cases the term "cell septum" is used by the community to refer to the region of the septum, but not actually the septum. A more general term would be "cell division site"
This one probably needs more explanation.
Often researchers say something is localized to the septum, when really they are seeing it in the medial region of the cell, these gene products are frequently not bona fida septum components.
I can get a list, but as we filter them I would need to get them from the next GOA release. I seem to remember there were a lot. A more conservative move might be to dump this KW mapping.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
--- old+++ new@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@-SP\_SL:SL-0455 for pombe is mapping to cell spetum.+SP\_SL:SL-0455 for pombe is mapping to cell septum.-In soem cases the term "cell septum" is used byt the community to refer to the region of the septum, but not actually the septum. A more general term would be "cell division site"+In some cases the term "cell septum" is used by the community to refer to the region of the septum, but not actually the septum. A more general term would be "cell division site"
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
We are not getting any GO annotations for pombe from this mapping anymore because of the taxon constraint on the cell septum term. The subcell location is still present on the UniProt entries, but the GO annotations are being suppressed.
This one probably needs more explanation.
Often researchers say something is localized to the septum, when really they are seeing it in the medial region of the cell, these gene products are frequently not bona fida septum components.
I can get a list, but as we filter them I would need to get them from the next GOA release. I seem to remember there were a lot. A more conservative move might be to dump this KW mapping.
Diff:
Hi Val,
We are not getting any GO annotations for pombe from this mapping anymore because of the taxon constraint on the cell septum term. The subcell location is still present on the UniProt entries, but the GO annotations are being suppressed.
It looks like there are 31 pombe proteins with this location; http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/?query=location:455&fil=organism%3A%22Schizosaccharomyces+pombe+%28strain+972+%2F+ATCC+24843%29+%28Fission+yeast%29+[284812]%22
Do you want to pursue this further?
no.