SL-0455 is used to map a number of fission yeast gene products to the septum, but these are not really seprum proteins (they are medial cortex, so they are close to the septum, but htey aren't septum components)
However, I don't think the reason I gave before was correct. The taxon constraint on this term is only in cellular organisms, so we should be getting the annotations from SL-0455. The reason I'm not seeing them is probably related to a problem we have had getting these annotations for Swiss-Prot entries. Therefore I have sent this onto UniProt to have a look at the assignment of SL-0455 to pombe proteins, although they would need a list of those proteins it is not acceptable for as there are several annotations to this term from PomBase - assuming these are correct?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
yep the PomBase ones are OK, the UniProt ones are mainly cytokinetic ring. I would need to temporarily block our filter on this KW to get a list. I can do this in the next day or so.
Val
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Val's reason: This wasn't really an annotation error, the papers do say "septum" but they don't really mean the septum they are using "septum" to mean "somewhere near the division site". These papers also preceded the more finer grained knowledge about the cytokinetic ring, medial ring and septum, so I'd say they were just out of date really...things move on....
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Duplicate of https://sourceforge.net/p/geneontology/annotation-issues/813/
However, I don't think the reason I gave before was correct. The taxon constraint on this term is only in cellular organisms, so we should be getting the annotations from SL-0455. The reason I'm not seeing them is probably related to a problem we have had getting these annotations for Swiss-Prot entries. Therefore I have sent this onto UniProt to have a look at the assignment of SL-0455 to pombe proteins, although they would need a list of those proteins it is not acceptable for as there are several annotations to this term from PomBase - assuming these are correct?
yep the PomBase ones are OK, the UniProt ones are mainly cytokinetic ring. I would need to temporarily block our filter on this KW to get a list. I can do this in the next day or so.
Val
SL-0455 should be removed from the following entries;
O13729 pun1
O14014 rga3
O14248 tea3
O14302 cyk3
O14362 smi1
O43052 rga1
O74338 blt1
O74562 sec8
O74771 dip1
O74846 sec6
O75004 cdc24
P36582 pck1
P87293 SPAC16A10.01
Q09690 pom1
Q09731 bun107
Q09746 bzz1
Q09763 gef1
Q10165 cnt6
Q10268 mac1
Q10437 bun62
Q10491 sec74
Q96WV2 SPCPB16A4.02c
Q9P6S3 uds1
Q9P7H1 clp1
Q9P7V9 ubp9
Q9Y7U5 rgf3
Q9Y7Z2 arf6
Val's reason: This wasn't really an annotation error, the papers do say "septum" but they don't really mean the septum they are using "septum" to mean "somewhere near the division site". These papers also preceded the more finer grained knowledge about the cytokinetic ring, medial ring and septum, so I'd say they were just out of date really...things move on....