[Gedcom-parse-devel] Re: Gedcom-parse

[Geert V. <Gee...@pa...>]

Geert Vantienen wrote:

> Hello Peter,
>
> I have downloaded the latest sources from the cvs tree, and I compile
> it,
> then I tried the testgedcom on my own gedcom file
> produced by lifelines.
>
> [gvtienen@gandalf t]$ ../testgedcom -2 ~/cvs/geert.ged >tmp.output
> ERROR: Error on line 5: The tag 'TIME' is not a valid tag within 'HEAD'
> ERROR: Error on line 1: parse error
>
> 0 HEAD
> 1 SOUR LIFELINES 3.0.6
> 1 DEST ANY
> 1 DATE 26 AUG 2001
> 1 TIME 10:31
> 0 @F1@ FAM
> 1 HUSB @I1@
> 1 WIFE @I2@
> ...
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Geert

Hello,
After updating (several times) the gedcom file with an editor:

ERROR: Error on line 5: The tag 'SUBM' is mandatory within 'HEAD', but
missing
ERROR: Error on line 6: The tag 'GEDC' is mandatory within 'HEAD', but
missing
ERROR: Error on line 9: The tag 'CHAR' is mandatory within 'HEAD', but
missing

I have also empty source lines (I guess this was my own mistake when
adding a new
person with lifelines:
ERROR: Error on line 18: Missing value


0 @F1@ FAM
1 HUSB @I1@
1 WIFE @I2@
1 MARR
2 DATE 21 Aug 1865
2 PLAC Kermt
2 SOUR
1 CHIL @I78@
...

Something simular for:
ERROR: Error on line 219: Missing value
0 @S5@ SOUR
1 REFN
1 TITL doodsbrief
1 AUTH
0 @F10@ FAM
...

I also have errors like:
ERROR: Error on line 932: The tag 'CITY' is not a valid tag within 'RESI'
ERROR: Error on line 933: The tag 'POST' is not a valid tag within 'RESI'

0 @I44@ INDI
1 NAME X/XX/
1 SEX M
1 RESI
2 ADDR Zelebaan 000
2 CITY Lokeren
2 POST 9160
1 NOTE xxxxxxxxxxx
1 FAMC @F11@
0 @I45@ INDI

I thought that in a RESI block you could have a ADDR block in which you
can have
POST and CITY lines ...
http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~pmcbride/gedcom/55gcch2.htm#ADDRESS_STRUCTURE

Kind regards,

Geert