RE: [Algorithms] Collision fun in cube hell

[Akbar A. <sye...@ea...>]

heh,
yeah i have always found this funny :)

we think our code is solid, but we "protect" it :) :) :)
then the art/other people come around and bash our stuff. 
guess it makes you think "diffrently" and forces us to code "those cases"


peace.
akbar A.

you have "heard";
now read,
www.beconvinced.com


-----Original Message-----
From: gda...@li...
[mailto:gda...@li...]On Behalf Of
Matthew MacLaurin
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 11:41 AM
To: gda...@li...
Subject: RE: [Algorithms] Collision fun in cube hell



> Guess what? I love collision detection :)

You must not have any artists thrashing the special cases for you. Game
artists have "collision special case" radar and will blow  your coding
confidence cache in the first ten frames of the simulation. I used to enjoy
physics coding... :^(

I think there's only three states for a collision system codebase:

- simplistic
- buggy
- abandoned

Uh oh...here comes Ron...run...

Enjoy your cubes....

But seriously, great work. Gimme the code. ;^)


_______________________________________________
GDAlgorithms-list mailing list
GDA...@li...
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/gdalgorithms-list