RE: [Algorithms] FPS Questions
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
From: Stephen J B. <sj...@li...> - 2000-08-01 22:39:31
|
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Tom Forsyth wrote: > I like the theory - shame move theaters show each image twice really, > otherwise it'd be a really good one. Yes - I didn't know they did that - but if you see double imaging in movies - then I'm still right about the 30/60Hz issues in games which is what matters. > Though to be fair I see double images > when movies pan (really bad flickery double images too - ugh) - so your > theory still holds. Yes - I guess I've never noticed the double imaging in movies because a) Even 48Hz stinks. b) Excessive motion blur to compensate for 48Hz stinks too. > "it evolved to throw rocks at rabbits running behind trees." How true. How > Quake :-) :-) Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail) L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax) Work: sj...@li... http://www.link.com Home: sjb...@ai... http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1 |