Re: [Algorithms] C++ inherited constructors

[Timur D. <ti...@3d...>]

Because base constructor will not call member method virtually, it will call
base class method.

_______________________
 Timur Davidenko.
 3Dion Inc. (www.3dion.com)
 e-mail: ti...@3d...


----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Drew" <ri...@ho...>
To: <gda...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Algorithms] C++ inherited constructors


> Why not have your base class constructor call a virtual private member
> function and overload that function in the derived class?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gda...@li...
> > [mailto:gda...@li...]On Behalf Of Matt
> > Adams
> > Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 9:19 PM
> > To: gda...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [Algorithms] C++ inherited constructors
> >
> >
> >
> > I need this for aesthetic reasons :)
> > I've got an abstract CThread class. If a want to create a new thread, I
> > build my process class and inherit CThread, which creates a new thread
by
> > construction.
> > Now I want my main-threadloop-class to inherit CThread, too, to
> > provide all
> > the thread functionality to my main thread. But that thread already
exists
> >  created by compiler ), and shouldn't be created again by CThread.
> > Of course I can put CThread () and ~CThread () in functions like
Create()
> > and Destroy() and leave the constructor / destructor empty. But it'd be
> > nicer if it could be done in another way...
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Favnir
> > To: gda...@li...
> > Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 1:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Algorithms] C++ inherited constructors
> >
> > The only way you can do this is to define a (preferably) protected
> > do-nothing constructor for the base class, and inherit it in the
subclass
> > constructor.
> >
> > But, why in the world would you need to do this, in the first place?
> >
> > Are,
> > F
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Matt Adams
> > To: gda...@li...
> > Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 12:22 PM
> > Subject: [Algorithms] C++ inherited constructors
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got a question about the C++ class hierarchy.
> >
> > class a
> > {
> >     a () {...}; // constr a
> > };
> >
> > class b : a
> > {
> >     b () {...}; // constr b
> > };
> >
> > b instance;
> >
> > When creating an instance of b, constructors for both class a and class
b
> > are called.
> > Is there a way to suppress the automatic calling of constructor a ?
> > Or something like 'overloading' the old constructor by a new one ?
> > I couldn't find anything like that in the compiler docs.
> >
> > Any help appreciated,
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GDAlgorithms-list mailing list
> > GDA...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/gdalgorithms-list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GDAlgorithms-list mailing list
> > GDA...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/gdalgorithms-list
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GDAlgorithms-list mailing list
> GDA...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/gdalgorithms-list
>