Re: [Algorithms] Formula for Damping f times
Brought to you by:
vexxed72
From: <Pau...@sc...> - 2009-06-05 13:10:27
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > So, this formula does not behave well with step variance. OP didn't > state he requires this explicitly, but it is important to note as it > can cause weird results later if you don't pay attention to that. > I'd prefer using pow(), as Fabian described, unless performance is > extremely critical there. Ahhh, we have a fixed timestep - i should have mentioned that up front, thanks for pointing that out alen.... Cheers, Paul. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify pos...@sc... This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for all known viruses. Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Limited Registered Office: 10 Great Marlborough Street, London W1F 7LP, United Kingdom Registered in England: 3277793 ********************************************************************** P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Universal 2.9.1 (Build 287) Charset: US-ASCII wsBVAwUBSikS+3ajGqjtoMHxAQhlaQf/TxisNYwY0Z+2d0z3+0g/yKzVfKXUhe/J hUI1sSrVl5USAQ0Tn8I+9eXJPNsOPSMLZsFd1TuFUdR06A+QX81wh7Xp4IVRl5yT pxam+UZBD6eJyPQKQrnMI3lMUxefOKD3ZqJs0YX/6GkKgsE4rxEi1Egc14kBj85V Wb+lIl5pIYA6OEB7gFgNljAqtTgfJfldDymscQ++yJ1pFRZboj0lNLpscx6guhnn z60xpbndIxkW0wv/v2q3foXfUaE4tZ36w9CbEmNGSJlK3UK0VAV+sjogtNf3c51D z03lV8GPB4FlqK9PBcfNF1K2ZVB3upXaYKc7nr9OG7mwOJUwn4PBcA== =wc34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |