Re: [Algorithms] Complexity of new hardware

[Nicholas \Indy\ R. <ar...@gm...>]

On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Jon Watte <jw...@gm...> wrote:
> If you do PC games, then C# is within inches of being a totally suitable
> general purpose replacement, and it already is a good replacement for
> many specific games or subsystems. It has nice reflection, you can poke
> at objects while you're developing the classes, it has good interfacing
> to existing native libraries, it has good performance, it allows
> byte-by-byte access, etc.

I don't know if PC Games include Mac or other *nix systems, but I
don't feel mono is yet mature enough for game development, and thus
for those who choose not to develop for Microsoft's platforms
exclusively it's not yet a suitable replacement.

Nicholas "Indy" Ray